Heather Mills McCuntny
Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 06:21PM The Judge in the case of Paul McCartney vs. Heather Mills awarded her $50 million dollars and around $70,000 a year in child support (excluding the cost of school and nannies.) When I heard this, I was like "what the fuck?!?! This is eggregious!!" Honestly, what in the fuck does she deserve $50 million for? This is absolutely ridiculous. Just because she spread her leg for McCartney doesn't mean she deserves a bunch of money. (Don't get me wrong, those titties are looking real good but you know they just flop out when you take the bra off and you're like "fuck, I thought they'de continue to look like that instead of two filthy bags of sand.")
Let's figure that there's about easily 1,000,000 women who want to fuck McCartney in the world. Say half of those are disgustingly old or just mangled looking. Of the remaining 500,000 there's probably 300,000 that are absolute trash, too obese, too hairy, etc. Once you weed out the fat hairlips you're left with a cool 200,000 women who are absoluely slamming. So out of all of those people why would Paul pick the one legged whore of the bunch?
On top of that, Paul made his big money before this bitch was even alive. She had literally nothing to do with him making money. She was lucky he threw a dog a bone and "fell in love" with her in the first place. If I was her, I'de keep my fucking mouth shut. What are you going to do with more than $50 million? For someone who claims to believe in giving to charity I don't see why she's such a greedy piece of shit. Her explanation is that $70,000 a year is not enough to raise a child on. Well, what about the other $50 million dollars? Don't tell me you are going to spend it on some new robotic leg, you evil robotic bitch!
Moral of the story. No matter how much you love amputees don't forget to get a prenuptual agreement. Rod Stewart would never let me down like this.
Reader Comments (2)
Although I agree with this article regarding Heather Mills 100%, I have a problem with your use of the word, "hairlip". First of all the correct word is "harelip" and it has nothing to do with having a hairy upper lip. It is a derogatory slang work for the birth defect known as cleft lip that derived from the afflicted resembling a hare or a rabbit. (See: www.cleftpalate.respironics.com for more information)
Was this word simply erroneously used? Following the rant on hairiness, perhaps that is what happened? I know your site is not the Mecca or political correctness (and that's one reason why I LOVE it) but, I just thought using a derogatory term for a birth defect to insult a group of people crossed the line.
Heather Mills is a despicable, money hungry, gold digger, regardless of her physical attributes (or lack there of).
hey I was super high. I made the word hairlip up and I'm going to copywrite it. I appreciate the comment though and hope I didn't offend you. I am aware of the cleft lip birth defect epidemic and I would never stoop that low to besmirch someone no matter what.
Love,
Brown Bear